Pawan Kumar Kharwar @ Pawan Kharwar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46177 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2026 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Pawan Kumar Kharwar @ Pawan Kharwar S/O Anil Kumar @ Anil Kharwar Village- Lebhari Tola Khaira, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan 2.
Anil Kharwar @ Anil Kumar S/O Ramasheesh Kharwar Village- Lebhari Tola Khaira, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan 3.
Vikash Kharwar @ Vikash Kumar Kharwar @ Vikash Kumar S/O Anil Kharwar @ Anil Kumar Village- Lebhari Tola Khaira, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan 4.
Sunil Kharwar @ Sunil Kumar S/O Jayprakash Kharwar Village- Lebhari Tola Khaira, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Ms. Eashita Raj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 351(2), 109, 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per F.I.R., on account of land dispute, all the named accused persons along with 8-10 unknown miscreants assaulted informant and her son as a result of which they sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. As a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46177 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026 2/2 matter of fact, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, measurement of the disputed land was being done and in that process, scuffle took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against these petitioners.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of dispute, accusation and case and counter case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Darauli P. S. Case No. 142 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T