Harishankar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7951 of 2015 ====================================================== Harishankar Mishra, S/o Sri Jatashankar Mishra, Resident of Village+P.O.- Adharpur, P.S.Ghanshyampur, District-Darbhanga-cum-Up Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Adharpur Block Goraboram, P.S. Ghanshyampur, Sub Division Biraul, District-Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Darbhanga

5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Biraul, Carbhanga.

6. The Block Development Officer, Goraboram, District Darbhanga.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Adharpur, Goraboram, District-Darbhanga.

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Adharpur, Goraboram, DistrictDarbhanga.

9. The Mukhiyapati, Krishnadeo Paswan, Gram Panchayat Raj Adharpur, Goraboram, District-Darbhanga.

10. The District Panchayat Officer, Darbhanga. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Jagnnath Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-5 Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-01-2016 Heard Mr. Jagannath Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. P. K. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General No.5, appearing for the State respondents. After some arguments, Mr. Jagannath Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this

Patna High Court CWJC No.7951 of 2015 (2) dt.13-01-2016 2/2 application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U