Ankit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44610 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2025 Thana- ALAMNAGAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
Ankit Kumar Madan Mandal R/o Village - Itahri Jhandapur Tola, Ward No. 10, P.S. -Alamnagar, District - Madhepura.
2.
Abhishek Kumar @ Avi Kumar S/o Anil Mandal R/o Village - Itahri Jhandapur Tola, Ward No. 10, P.S. -Alamnagar, District - Madhepura.Presently resident of-Khushi Enterprises RamKrishna Nagar, Sampatchak, Patna.
3.
Nitish Kumar S/o Prakash Mandal Resident of village-Itahri Tola, Jhandapur, ward no.10, P.S-Alamnagar, District-Madhepura. 4.
Nitish Kumar S/o Nirdhan Mandal @ Nirmal Mandal Resident of villageItahri Jhandapur Tola, Ward no.10, PS-Alamnagar, District-Madhepura, presently resident of- B.N. Art Studio, Naya Bazar Siran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pawan Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 321 of 2025 dated 07.11.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 74, 351(2), 352 of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the
2/4 accused persons including the petitioners is of assaulting the Informant and his mother by means of lathi and danda.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Counsel for the petitioners, by referring to the contents of the F.I.R., submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature and there is nothing specific against them. It is further submitted that there is also a finding recorded in the impugned order that the injuries sustained by Santosh Mandal, Ranju Devi and Jyotish Kumar have been found to be simple in nature and insofar as the injuries, which have been sustained by the Informant namely Deepak Kumar, is concerned, the same is not on the vital part while x-ray report till date has not been submitted by him to record its findings. Referring to the findings recorded in the impugned order, it has been submitted that the injuries have not been found on vital part of the body on any of the injured persons, while the investigation is still under process.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the injuries have been found to be
3/4 simple in nature and not on vital part of the body on any of the injured persons and as also the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Uda Kishunganj, Dist. Madhepura in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 321 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
4/4 (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T