← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9159/2017bail granted

Mahendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-20Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9159 of 2017 (3) dt.20-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9159 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2016 Thana -ROUH District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Mahendra Yadav Son of Bangali Yadav Resident of Village : Bhandajor, P.S.: - Roh, District - Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Roh P.S Case No. 52 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner and other co-accused were assaulting the son and daughter-in-laws of the informant. Coaccused Dilip Yadav assaulted Sarita Devi with Lathi on her head and the petitioner assaulted Rekha Devi with Lathi and Danda on her waist causing injury.

Submission is of false implication and that there is case and counter case, both side have received injuries. There was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9159 of 2017 (3) dt.20-04-2017 free fight between the parties and there was no intention to commit murder. Occurrence took place at the spur of the moment. There is no allegation that petitioner has repeated the blow and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that there is no allegation for repeating the blow and also the opinion of kind of injury was kept reserve and, as such, the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nawada in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 52 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T