Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16586 of 2021 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Singh S/o Manik Singh, Resident of Khendabarun, P.S. Barun, District-Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Bihar.

2.

District Transport Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas.

3.

Regional Transport Office, Patna.

4.

Shashikala Devi, W/o Late Manoj Singh, Resident of Banarsia, P.S. Sasaram Mufasil, District-Rohtas.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Upendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Anil Kr. Singh (GP26) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 24-08-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions commanding the respondent authorities to granted ownership in favour of Vijay Kumar Singh said vehicle truck bearing registration No. BR24GB/2803 Engine No. 1SBE5918040 81J63725903 and Chesis No.

MAT541068J26697 on account of transfer agreement of seller Manoj Singh to Vijay Singh. (ii) For issuance of appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/ direction(s) for issue permit all

Patna High Court CWJC No.16586 of 2021(3) dt.24-08-2022 2/3 of India on account of ownership of aforesaid vehicle bearing registration No. BR24GB/2803. (iii) For issuance of appropriate writ(s)/order(s), direction (s) for setting aside representation dated ---- in matter of cancellation of ownership.

(iv) For any other relief(s) that the petitioner is entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."

After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner shall be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and to take recourse to such other alternate remedies which are equally efficacious in law, including under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Prayer allowed.

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

It stands clarified that all issues of fact and law are

Patna High Court CWJC No.16586 of 2021(3) dt.24-08-2022 3/3 left open to be agitated by the competent authority. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Satyavrat Verma, J) K.C.Jha/DKS U