Krishna Mohan Prasad Bhagat @ Krishna Mohan Bhagat And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1019 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12726 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Krishna Mohan Prasad Bhagat @ Krishna Mohan Bhagat, son of Late Bindeshwari Prasad Bhagat.

2. Most. Shobha Devi, wife of Late Hira Lal Bhagat @ Hira Lal Prasad Bhagat, daughter of Late Bindeshwari Prasad Bhagat.

3. Rajendra Kumar, son of Late Hira Lal Bhagat @ Hira Lal Prasad Bhagat.

4. Archana Kumari.

5. Baby Kumari.

6. Manish Kumar.

7. Nitish Kumar. Sl. No. 4 & 5 Daughter of Late Hira Lal Bhagat @ Hira Lal Prasad Bhagat, under the guardianship of their mother Most. Shobha Devi.

8. Shankar Prasad Bhagat @ Sheo Shankar Prasad Bhagat. Son of Late Bindeshwari Prasad Bhagat. All resident of Village - Parveli, P.S.- Kadwa, District - Katihar.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sri Prakash Kumar Jha, The Collector, Katihar.

3. Shri Ashok Kumar Jha, The Additional Collector (Land Ceiling), Katihar.

4. Md. Shahood, The Circle Officer, Kadwa.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Sah @ Baranwal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Yogendra Pd. Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-07-2016 The statement made in paragraph No.8 of the

Patna High Court MJC No.1019 of 2015 (4) dt.20-07-2016 2/2 supplementary show cause reads as under:-

8. That in these circumstances, the land in question (purchased by the petitioners before 09.09.1979) has now been de-notified vide Notification No.180 dated 23.09.2015 published in Gazette No.21/2015 dated 9.10.2015 and the said land shall certainly be made available to the petitioners giving them possession over the same upto October, 2016. It will not be out of place to be mentioned here that this time the District Administration is badly engaged in conducting the Panchayat Election successfully." 2.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the Administration is required to hand over the land to the petitioner upto October, 2016. If the Administration fails to comply his own undertaking the petitioner will be at liberty to file a petition for revival of the Contempt Petition.

3.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U