Patna High CourtMJC/3020/2015disposed

M/S S.K.Enterprises v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Binay Kumar Secretary Rural Works Department Patna And ORS

2017-04-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.3020 of 2015 dt.12-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3020 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6614 of 2015 =========================================================== M/s S.K. Enterprises through its Sole Proprietor, Shailendra Kumar Singh aged about 45 years son of Late Jay Narayan Siingh, Q. No. 1305, Ser 1/C B.S. City, Police Station B.S.C. District- Bokaro.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Binay Kumar, Secretary, Rural Works Department, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna .

2. Sri Binay Kumar, the Secretary, Rural Works Department Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

3. Sri Kamlesh Choudhary, Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

4. Sri Puneshwar Rajak, Executive Engineer-II, Rural Works Department, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

5. Tender Committee, Rural Works Department, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the OPs : Mr. S.K.Singh AAG 11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the judgment of this Court dated 05.08.2015 passed in CWJC No. 6614 of 2015.

Patna High Court MJC No.3020 of 2015 dt.12-04-2017

3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of Opposite Parties Annexure-I whereof being a letter dated 17.01.2017 discloses that a final decision has been taken by the authorities and thus it is submitted that the judgment of this Court stands complied with.

4. In the above view of the matter, MJC No. 3020 of 2015stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case it is aggrieved by the order of the authorities as noticed above, it may agitate the same before an appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 13.04.2017 Transmission Date N.A.