← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2410/2015disposed

Surya Kali Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-16Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.2410 of 2015 (3) dt.16-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2410 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17981 of 2014 ====================================================== Surya Kali Devi, wife of Sri Ram Pravesh Sharma, Resident of Village- Datiyana, Police Station- Bikram, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Bihar State Election Authority through its Chief Election Officer, Namely Sri Phul Singh, Son of name not known to the Petitioner, 32, Harding Road, Patna-800001.

3.

Sri Fhul Singh, Son of name not known to the Petitioner, the Chief Election Officer, Bihar State Election Authority, 32 Harding Road, Patna 800001. 4.

Vinay kumar, Son of name not known to the Petitioner, Under Secretary, Bihar State Election Authority, 32 Harding Road, Patna 800001. 5.

Sanjay kumar Agrawal, Son of name not known to the Petitioner, District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer (Cooperative Society), Patna. 6.

Sri Pankaj Kumar Jha, Son of name not known to the Petitioner, the District Cooperative Officer, Patna.

7.

Nevedita, Son of name not known to the Petitioner, Block Development Officer -cum- Returing Officer, Block Bikram, District Patna. 8.

Kumar Shant Rakshit, Son of name not known to the Petitioner, the Managing Director, Paltiputra Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Patna. 9.

Musrouk Alam, Son of name not known to the Petitioner, the Managing Director, Bikram Branch of Paltiputra Central Cooperative Bank Limited, District- Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 16-08-2017 Counsel for the parties are present and they are in agreement that the order of this Court has been complied. The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U