Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11348/2018dismissed

Vijay Prasad Patwa v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-04-25Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11348 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -136 Year- 2003 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Vijay Prasad Patwa, Son of Prithvi Chand Patwa, Resident of MohallaDahiawan, Barahaman Toli, Town and P.S. Chapra, District-Saran at Chapra (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Ram Patwa, Son of Late Motilal Patwa, R/o Sonar Toi, Sasaram, P.S. Sasaram Town, District-Rohtas.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Nath Mishra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 136 of 2003 UT No. 27 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is husband of the deceased. There is allegation that niece of the informant was tortured by the petitioner for demand of dowry and the informant got information that his niece has been done to death in her sasural by administering poison. The informant went to the sasural of his niece and found her niece dead and petitioner and other accused persons were disposing off the dead body.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11348 of 2018 (3) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 In the complaint petition it is alleged that no information was given to him about the death of his niece. The informant inquired about death of his niece but the accused persons did not disclose the correct fact and disposed of the body with intention to screen the evidence.

In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Petitioner may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail which shall be considered by the court below in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T