Shyam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45638 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2022 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Shyam Yadav Son Of Late Naresh Yadav Resident Of Village- Raili Ward No. 10, Ps- Amour, Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. According to the prosecution story, it is alleged that the petitioner is indulged in hatching conspiracy to kill the informant's son in connivance with other accused persons. The informant was seen lastly with the accused persons thereafter, his dead body was found in the field of Abdul Wahab.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. From perusal of FIR as well as case diary, it appears the son of informant was gone missing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45638 of 2023(3) dt.04-10-2023 2/2 thereafter the informant raised only suspicion against the petitioner and implicated him in the present case. It is a case of last seen and no one is eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Except suspicion, no any consistent material has come against the petitioner to suggest his complicity in the alleged offence. The petitioner has also not motive behind murder of the deceased. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since 22.11.2022.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody period, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 325 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Purnea.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T