Suleman Hassain v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48524 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2024 Thana- AKHODHIGOLA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Suleman Hassain Son of Late Sakhavat Hussain R/O Village- Baradhi Gola, P.S.- Akodhigola, District- Rohtas 2.
Ritu Raj @ Ritu Raj Kumar @ Golu Kumar Son of Jitendra Singh R/O Village.- Chandi, Ward no. 03, P.S.- Akodhigola, District.- Rohtas 3.
Anwar Hussain Son of Sultan Hussain R/O Village.- Baradhi Gola, P.S.- Akodhigola, District.- Rohtas 4.
Irfan Alam @ Md. Irfan Alam Son of Gulam Sarvan R/O Village.- Chapra Ganpat, Ward no. 4 P.S.- Akodhigola, District.- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Abhijit Prabhat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Akorhigola P.S. Case no. 25 of 2024 registered under sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
3. As per the prosecution case, on a raid being conducted it is stated that duplicate Fevi Kwik used as an adhesive was found at the shops of the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48524 of 2024(2) dt.08-08-2024 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, who are villagers and have no idea of the material being supplied to them by the company authorities, have been falsely implicated in the case. Even accepting the allegations levelled, there is no allegation against the petitioners of manufacturing or packaging etc of any duplicate Fevi Kwik. The allegation is only of recovery of some articles which was supplied to them by the representatives of the company itself. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to cooperate in the case.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioners in the F.I.R., there being no allegation of manufacturing, packaging or supplying of the said articles and the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that all the four petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Akorhigola P.S. Case no. 25 of 2024 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48524 of 2024(2) dt.08-08-2024 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri, Rohtas. (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T