Arun Rawat @ Arun Kumar Rawat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43710 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2026 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Arun Rawat @ Arun Kumar Rawat S/O Fagu Rawat Resident Of VillageKhujwa, P.s.- Raghunathpur, Dist.- Siwan 2.
Aju Rawat @ Aju Kumar Rawat S/O Mundrika Rawat @ Mundraka Ravat Resident Of Village- Khujwa, P.s.- Raghunathpur, Dist.- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, informant alleged that on 09.02.2026, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came and assaulted informant and his father. It is further alleged that these two petitioners misbehaved with sister-in-law of the informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43710 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of long standing land dispute between the parties, for which coaccused Mundrika Rawat had earlier filed a title suit bearing Title Suit No. 78 of 2015 and the same has been decreed in favour of co-accused Mundrika Rawat, a free fight took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been levelled against these petitioners. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43710 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-I, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 58 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T