← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./906/2021bail granted

Vinod Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2021-06-25Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.906 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2020 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Vinod Mahto Son Of Bharat Mahto Resident Of Village - Kedar Parsa, P.S. - Rasulpur, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. N. N. Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-06-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 324, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the accused persons is of assaulting the children of the informant due to which they sustained injuries. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The nature of injury is said to be simple in nature. The said injury reports are Annexure-2

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.906 of 2021(2) dt.25-06-2021 2/2 series to the present application. Hence, no offence under section 307 IPC is made out. At best, it is a case for offence under section 325 IPC.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -X, Saran, Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 62/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T