Md. Naqeeb @ Naqeeb Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57101 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2021 Thana- GURARU District- Gaya ====================================================== Md. Naqeeb @ Naqeeb Alam Son Of Md. Fakhruddin @ Fakhruddin @ Fakhruddin Ansari @ Feku Resident Of Village - Bela, P.S.- Guraru, District -Gaya ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that two months earlier, the petitioner along with two other accused persons came to his place and bought cereals worth Rs.71,000/- from the informant and paid only Rs.10,000/- in cash with an assurance that the rest amount will be paid, but now, the accused persons including the petitioner is refusing to pay the remaining amount as aforesaid and has also threatened the informant that he will be killed. It is next alleged that the petitioner and the accused persons have also duped the other farmers as detailed in the F.I.R. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The F.I.R.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57101 of 2021(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 does not even remotely suggest that as to when the payment was made, what was the amount of paddy, which was purchased by the petitioner. It is next submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and if the petitioner duped any other farmers, then they would have filed cases against him, but no such case has ever been filed against the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bailbonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Guraru P. S. Case No.24 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T