Narendra Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8784 of 2018 ====================================================== Narendra Kumar Son of Shri Baleshwar Yadav, Resident of Nandlal ka Dera, P.O.-Laxmi ka Dera, P.S.-Bhojpur, District-Bhojpur, Bihar,802112 Presently Posted as Subedaar Major, Personal No. 057070111, HQ/218 Bn, Central Reserve Police Force, Noonmati, Assam.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India, through secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi.
2.
The Director General, Central Reserve Police Force, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.
3.
The Inspector General of Police Personnel, Central Reserve Police Force, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.
4.
The Inspector General of Police, Es Central Reserve Police Force, HC Block, Sector-III, P.O.-I.B. Market, Salt Lake, Kolkata- 700106. 5.
The Inspector General, Central Reserve Police Force, North East Sector, Assam.
6.
The Deputy Inspector General, Central Reserve Police Force, Guwahati Range, Assam.
7.
The Commandant, 128 Bn. Central Reserve Police Force, Noonmati Guwahati, Aassam.
8.
The Staff Selection Commission, CR Department of Personnel and Training, 8A-B Beli Road, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh.
9.
The Regional Director, CR Staff Selection Commission, 21-23, Lawther Road, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh.
10.
The Deputy Director Recruitment, Staff Selection Commission, Department of Personnal and Training, 8A-B Beli Road, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. S.D Sanjay Addl. Soc. Gen.
For the Union of India :
Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Sr. C.G.C.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 13-08-2024 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned counsel for the Union of India is present.
2. Vide order dated 30.07.2024, it transpires to this
Patna High Court CWJC No.8784 of 2018(4) dt.13-08-2024 2/2 Court that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned for one week with specific direction that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date fixed, appropriate order shall be passed. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
3. In this background, it transpires to this Court that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ application and therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this writ application.
4. In this view of the matter, the present writ application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- Aman/- U