← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10644/2015disposed

Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-11Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10644 of 2015 ====================================================== Ajay Kumar, Son of Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, Resident of VillageDumri, Mahabir Asthan Chowk, Gobarsahi, P.S. Muzaffarpur Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur, through the Presiding Officer.

5. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur.

6. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur.

7. The District Programe Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur.

8. The Pramukh-cum-Chairman, Block Selection Committee, Gaighat District- Muzaffarpur.

9. The Block Development Officer, Gaighat, District Muzaffarpur.

10. The Block Education Officer, Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed off with liberty to move before the State Appellate Authority against the order dated 19.12.2014 passed in Complaint Case No. 81 of

Patna High Court CWJC No.10644 of 2015 (2) dt.11-12-2017 2/2 2013, by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Muzaffarpur.

3. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

5. If an appeal is filed before the State Appellate Authority, within one month from today, the same shall be considered and disposed off on merits expeditiously and within the statutory period.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr.

U