Ruby Devi @ Chotki Mami v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25669 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -331 Year- 2017 Thana -NAUBATPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ruby Devi @ Chotki Mami, W/o Bihari Ram, R/o Mohalla- Buddha Colony, P.S.- Buddha Colony, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sahin Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Naubatpur P.S.Case No.331 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under 304B, 201 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner who happens to be cousin mother in law (Choti Mami) was taunting for demand of dowry to the deceased and there is allegation that they have killed the deceased.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except that allegation there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and she is distant Mami of the deceased. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25669 of 2018 (3) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on surrender she will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-II, Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S.Case No.331 of 2017 dated 19.10.2017 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of her bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T