Rani Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49006 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2024 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Rani Kumari D/o- Kishor Chandrabanshi @ Krishna Singh Chandravanshi Village- Bishanpur W.No-1, Po- mali Ps- Beldaur Dist- Khagaria 2.

Shiromani Devi wife of Gopal Chandrabanshi Village- Bishanpur W.No-1, Po- mali Ps- Beldaur Dist- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Beldaur P.S. Case No. 61 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the petitioners along with other co-accused persons have kidnapped the daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49006 of 2024(3) dt.13-11-2024 2/2 there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, only on the basis of suspicion petitioner are made accused in the present case. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the victim is still trace-less and the investigation still going on.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

7. However, if the petitioners surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order, considering the fact that the petitioners are female. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T