← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11819/2022disposed

M/S Maa Shakti Engineering Works v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-24The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11819 of 2022 ====================================================== M/s Maa Shakti Engineering Works through Proprietor Nageshwar Sharma, aged about 67 years, (M), son of Late Baijnath Sharma, resident of VillageSandalpur Main Road, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principle Secretory Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

The Chief Engineer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Mourya Lok Complex, Patna.

4.

The Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Mourya Lok Complex, Patna.

5.

The Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Mourya Lok Complex, Patna.

6.

The Chairman, Patna Municipal Corporation, Mourya Lok Complex, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Manglam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Abbas Haider (SC 6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 24-08-2022 The petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- "That this writ application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs order/orders direction/directions directing and commanding the respondents authorities to make payment of the admitted dues amount of Rs. 717534/- against the Estimate work order No. 8323 dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.11819 of 2022 dt.24-08-2022 2/3 03.08.2016 for 720 Hand Trolley had been supplied of Patna Municipal Corporation, Mourya Lok Complex, Patna to the petitioner along with its interest, the petitioner also prayed for any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is legally entitled to on the facts and circumstances of the case."

After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner shall be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and to take recourse to such other alternate remedies which are equally efficacious in law.

Prayer allowed.

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

It stands clarified that all issues of fact and law are left open to be agitated by the competent authority.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11819 of 2022 dt.24-08-2022 3/3 Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Satyavrat Verma, J) K.C.Jha/Kundan AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 25.08.2022 Transmission Date