Santosh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26428 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2016 Thana -LAURIYA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Santosh Ram, S/o Lalan Ram, R/o Village- Belwa More, P.S.- Lauriya, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 5/ 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Lauriya P.S. Case No.93 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 147, 149, 323, 379, 506 Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that there is land dispute between the Petitioner and the Informant and Title Suit No.38 of 2016 is pending between the parties.

In the instant case, there is general and omnibus allegation that while the informant was returning from his field he was assaulted by the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26428 of 2018 (5) dt.04-07-2018 2/2 six weeks from today in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No.93 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T