← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10130/2024disposed

Sweta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-04Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10130 of 2024 ====================================================== Sweta Kumari Daughter of Late Mahendra Vishwakarma, Wife of Ritu Raj Resident of Mohalla- Naga Bigha, Patel Colony, P.S.- Town, DistrictAurangabad and at present Assistant Teacher at Upgraded Middle School, Anandpura, Gram Panchayat Amba, P.S. and Block- Kutumba, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Education Officer, Aurangabad.

5.

The District Program Officer, Establishment, Education Department, Aurangabad.

6.

The Block Education Officer, Kutumba Block, P.S.- Kutumba, DistrictAurangabad. 7.

The Block Panchayat Raj Officer, P.S. and Block- Kutumba, DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Yogal Kishore, Advocate Ms. Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, AC to GP-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation on 28.05.2024 before the respondent no.5, which has not been disposed of as yet.

3. In such view of the matter, I direct the respondent no.5 to dispose of the representation dated 28.05.2024 (Annexure-P/8 to the writ application) of the petitioner by a reasoned and

Patna High Court CWJC No.10130 of 2024(2) dt.04-07-2024 2/2 speaking order within eight weeks.

4. It is made clear that this Court may take serious view if the order is not complied within the stipulated period.

5. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U