Sheoji Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26803 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2018 Thana -DORIGANJ District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Sheoji Rai, S/o Late Prabhu Rai,
2. Ranjan Kumar Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar, S/o Sheoji Rai, Both are Residents of Vill.- Kazi Tola, P.S.- Doriganj, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Arif, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Doriganj P.S. Case No. 28 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 379, 201, 120(B), 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner No. 1 is owner of the truck. Therefore no question arises regarding vehicle having been stolen from campus of the police station. It has been submitted that the instant case has been filed as counter blast of Complaint Case filed by petitioner No. 1 against the informant vide Complaint Case No. 262 of 2018 on 31.1.2018.
It has further been submitted that petitioner No. 2 is son of petitioner No. 1.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26803 of 2018 (3) dt.18-05-2018 2/2 Station.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 28 of 2018, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T