Dharmendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46455 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2023 Thana- TEYAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== DHARMENDRA YADAV SON OF TEJU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TIYAR PS TIYAR DIST BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tiyrar P.S. Case No. 25 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, petitioner is said to have abused and assaulted the informant and his husband brutally due to which they sustained injuries.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. Both the parties are next door
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46455 of 2023(5) dt.09-01-2024 2/2 neighbours and there is previous enmity between them. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is serious allegation against the petitioner to assault the informant and his husband brutally due to which the husband of the informant has sustained grievous injury. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case as well as nature of the injury sustained by the informant's husband i.e. grievous, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T