← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2410/2019dismissed

Shyam Chandra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-02Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2410 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5459 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Shyam Chandra Singh Son of Late Brij Nandan Singh Resident of villageDaulatpur-dih, P.S.- Gaurichak, District- Patna. 2.

Vijay Kumar Son of Nandu Rai Resident of village- Akbarpur, P.O. Saurampur, P.S. Naubatpur District- Patna.

3.

Radhe Shyam Sharma Son of Late Bhuneshwar Sharma, Resident of villageMadhopur, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Arun Kumar Singh, The Principal Secretary Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Lokesh Kumar Singh, The Commissioner, Saran.

5.

Ranjita, The Collector Saran at Chapra.

6.

Rampukar Ranjan, The Engineer- in Chief Irrigation Creation, Water Resources Department, Patna.

7.

Ashok Kumar Chaudhary, The Chief Engineer, Irrigation Creation, Water Resources, Siwan.

8.

Ashok Kumar Nagmani, The Executive Engineer, Saran Nahar Pramandal Chapra.

9.

Rampadarath Pd. Narain, The Executive Engineer, Saran Nahar Pramandal Ekma, District- Saran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amarendra Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinay Kriti Singh (GA- 2) Mr. Sumant Kr. Singh, AC to GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 02-02-2024 The learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that since the petitioners have already attained the age of superannuation, their

Patna High Court MJC No.2410 of 2019(4) dt.02-02-2024 2/2 claim for regularization has been rendered infructuous, hence they be permitted to withdraw the present petition, nonetheless, they be granted liberty to agitate their grievances regarding payment of arrears of wages, if any, in accordance with law.

2.

Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as not pressed, however, with the aforesaid liberty.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U