Dhaniklal Singh Yadav @ Dhanik Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2027 of 2021 ====================================================== Dhaniklal Singh Yadav @ Dhanik Lal Yadav, Male aged about 56 years, Son of Sri Laxmi Yadav, Resident of Village- Barha, P.O.- Barha, P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

4.

The District Supply Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Benipatti, District- Madhubani. 6.

The Block Supply Officer, Benipatti, District- Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) Date : 03-12-2021 The matter has been heard via video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 10.08.2019 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Benipatti, District- Madhubani whereby and where under the PDS license of the petitioner bearing license No 63/2016 dated 11.05.2016 has been cancelled.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2027 of 2021 dt.03-12-2021 2/2 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to file appropriate appeal under Rule 32(iii) of the Bihar Targeted PDS (Control) Order, 2016.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose off the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority by filing appropriate appeal against the aforesaid order dated 10.08.2019 and in case such an appeal is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the appellate authority shall consider the same on merits and dispose off the same, in accordance with law, by a reasoned and a speaking order, within a period of eight weeks, thereafter. (Rajan Gupta, J) (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) P. Kumar/Anand Kr.

AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date