← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/575/2016disposed

Sazida Gufrana v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-09Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.575 of 2016 ====================================================== Sazida Gufrana w/o Firoz Alam, resident of - Kuraiya, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Director, Bihar Education Project Council, Shiksha Bhawan, Rastrbhasha Parishad Campus Saidpur, Rajendranagar, Patna-4

2. Director, Bihar Education Project Council, Shiksha Bhawan, Rastrabhasha Parishad Campus Saidpur, Rajendranagar, Patna.

3. The District Education officer, Bihar Education Project East Champaran, Motihari.

4. The District Programme Officer, Primary Education and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Bihar Education Project, East Champaran.

5. The District Education Superintendent cum District Programme Coordinator, Bihar, Education Project, East Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mujtabul Haque : Mr. Manish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-10-2018 In view of the dispute involved in the present writ petition, no positive direction can be issued in favour of the petitioner, however the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the Project Director for consideration of her case on sympathetic consideration as the petitioner has obtained necessary qualification.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn and in case, any representation is filed by the petitioner, the Project Director

Patna High Court CWJC No.575 of 2016 (6) dt.09-10-2018 2/2 shall consider and dispose of the representation expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the representation.

It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merit including the issue of maintainability of the writ petition. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U