Sunil Paswan @ Sunil Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47390 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2022 Thana- LODIPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Sunil Paswan @ Sunil Kumar Paswan Son Of Dinesh Paswan R/O MohallaAnandpur, P.O.- Agarpur, P.S.- Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur. 2.

Rohit Yadav @ Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Yadav Son Of Uday Yadav @ Uday Prasad Yadav R/O Mohalla- Anandpur, P.O.- Agarpur, P.S.- Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur.

3.

Santosh Yadav @ Niranjan Kumar Yadav Son Of Uday Yadav @ Uday Prasad Yadav R/O Mohalla- Anandpur, P.O.- Agarpur, P.S.- Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur.

4.

Changori Paswan @ Changuary Paswan Son Of Dinesh Yadav R/O Mohalla- Anandpur, P.O.- Agarpur, P.S.- Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No.63 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners no.2 and 3 have got one criminal antecedent whereas petitioners no.1 and 4 have got no criminal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47390 of 2022(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries. The injuries are simple in nature. It is submitted that there is admitted land dispute between the parties.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the facts that both sides sustained injuries and the injuries are simple in nature, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No.63 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T