← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45412/2022bail granted

Nayeem Akhtar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-29Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45412 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2022 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Nayeem Akhtar Son Of Zahiruddin R/O Village- Surha Chowk, Ward No.-03, P.S.- Amour, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Amaur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(c), 22 and 25 of the NDPS Act. As per the prosecution, the informant along with other police personnel acting upon a secret information raided the alleged place and apprehended this petitioner and upon making search from the possession of this petitioner 22 pudiyas of narcotic material suspected to be smack weighing 8.56 grams in totality, a cash of Rs.9300/- and a mobile phone were recovered.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45412 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel Mr. Bipin Kumar appearing for the petitioner are that the petitioner has clean antecedent and the alleged contraband which was suspected to be smack was slightly more than the small quantity and for the alleged wrong the petitioner has sufficiently been punished and he has been languishing in jail since 20.05.2022.

Learned APP Mr. Shailendra Kumar appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer.

Having considered the above submissions and mainly taking into account the petitioner's clean antecedent and the quantity of the alleged suspected contraband and also the fact that the investigation has been completed against the petitioner as per the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in the opinion of this Court a lenient approach can be taken in respect of the petitioner's prayer, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Amaur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2022.

(Shailendra Singh, J.) sangam/- U T