Patna High CourtCWJC/5196/2015dismiss for nonprosecution

Masroor Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-27Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5196 of 2015 ====================================================== Masroor Ahmad son of late Islamul Haque, Head of the Department of Sociology, Rural Institute Higher Education, Birauli, Police Station- Pusa, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Department of Human Resources & Development (Higher Education) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Rural Institute (Birauli) Society, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, having its registered Office at Birauli, P.S. Pusa, District- Samastipur through its Secretary. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to SC 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-08-2018 Counsel for the respondent State submits that upon recommendation of the Selection Committee dated 6.5.2016 one Dr. Vinod Kumar Suman has been appointed as Regular Director in the Rural Institute, Birauli, Samastipur under notification dated 19.5.2016, issued by the Education Department. In view of the said development subsequent to filing of the writ petition, he submits that the relief prayed for has become in-fructuous. It is pointed out that the writ petition was filed challenging the advertisement inviting application for appointment to the said post. Though copy of counter affidavit has been served upon counsel for the petitioner on 10.4.2017

Patna High Court CWJC No.5196 of 2015 (4) dt.27-08-2018 2/2 placing on record the fact of appointment of said Dr. Vinod Kumar Suman, till date neither re-joinder has been filed nor the selection/appointment of Dr. Vinod Kumar Suman has been challenged.

Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner, without going into merits of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent State, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.