Ranjeet Rajak @ Ranjeet Kumar Rajak @ Bhaiji v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50079 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-882 Year-2017 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== Ranjeet Rajak @ Ranjeet Kumar Rajak @ Bhaiji Son of Late Dhamu Baitha @ Channu Rajak R/O Vill.- Panapur Langa, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, Dist.- Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Vinit Kumar Shukla Son of Late Baidyanath Shuklla R/O Vill.- Panapur Langa, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, Dist.- Vaishali at Hajipur 3.

Kalpna Kumari Wife of Ranjeet Kumar Rajak R/O Vill.- Panapur Langa, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, Dist.- Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP For the Complainant/ O.P. No. 2: Mr. Lakshmi Kant Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 882 of 2017, instituted under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, wife of the complainant has been enticed away by the petitioner and kidnapped her with intention to sell her or for the purpose of illegal act.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50079 of 2024(4) dt.22-03-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Wife of the complainant was married with the complainant by her father against her will and the complainant's family tortured her due to which she left her matrimonial house. Wife of the complainant is major. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to co-operate in the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VII, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 882 of 2017, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T