Ram Dayal Rai v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12404 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -223 Year- 2013 Thana -RAJPUR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Ram Dayal Rai Son of Late Vindhyachal Rai, Resident of VillageDihari, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Guddu Rai @ Dhananjay Rai, Son of Subhas Chandra Rai, Resident of Village- Dihari, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Buxar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Moleshwar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Opposite party No.2 has been released on compulsory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner, who is informant of concerned Rajpur P. S. Case No. 223 of 2013, is aggrieved by release of Opposite party No.2 on bail under the said provisions. Upon perusal of the materials on record, it appears that within the statutory period of 90 days, till the Opposite party No.2 had applied for furnishing bail bonds before the Court below, no charge-sheet was submitted and accordingly, he was ordered to be released on bail. Only after his release on bail, the charge-sheet came to be submitted by the police.

There is no allegation of any misuse of conditions of bail allowed to Opposite party No.2.

I do not find any ground having been made out for cancellation of bail.

This application has no merit and it is, accordingly, dismissed.

ArunKumar/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) U