Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14819/2018dismissed

Chandan Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14819 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -292 Year- 2017 Thana -HARSIDHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Chandan Kumar, Son of Gagandeo Sahani, resident of Village- Dhekaha Bishunpur, Police Station- Piprakothi, District- East Champaran.

2. Ravindra Kumar, Son of Biltu Sahani, Resident of village- Sonbarsa, Police Station- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 292 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304, 316/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners that they forcibly took the wife of informant to their clinic and injected saline as well as gave injection and after that the condition of the wife of informant started deteriorating and she died and thereafter, the petitioners and other staffs of the clinic fled away.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that out and out false and fabricated allegation has been levelled against the petitioners and they are not the doctor rather the said clinic

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14819 of 2018 (3) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 belongs to one Dr. Javed.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that it is the petitioners, who took the deceased to the hospital, thereafter, she died and they fled away. Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant the petitioners, the privilege of anticipatory bail, this application is accordingly dismissed.

However, the petitioners, if so desire my surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T