Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12159/2017rejected

Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-08-23Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12159 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -185 Year- 2016 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Ram S/o Surendra Ram Resident of VillageBajeetpur, P.S.-Maner, Dist.-Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Baby Devi, D/o Rajendra Ram, W/o Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Ram, Resident of Village-Barah, P.S.-Rani Talab, District-Patna. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2017 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Compliant Case No. 185 (C) of 2016, registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the S.D.J.M. Danapur (Patna).

The accusation is of torturing of the complainant by her husband and other in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and also removing her from matrimonial house along with her child after snatching her personal belongings. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the joint prayer of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12159 of 2017 (6) dt.23-08-2017 2/2 Centre to settle their dispute amicably, but matter could not be solved.

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P.No.2 submits that O.P. No.2 is willing to live with her husband (Petitioner), but petitioner is not ready to keep her with full dignity.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trail Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T