The Central Board Of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.215 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9499 of 2018 ====================================================== The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization through the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner- I, Regional Office, Patna having his office at R.Block, Road No. 6, P.S.- Sachivalaya, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Registrar, Cooperative Department, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Limited through its Managing Director, Gandhi Maidan, Bihar, Patna. 3.

Anil Kumar Sinha, Son of Late Kedar Lal, resident of Village- Asni, P.S.- Magadh University (Bodh Gaya), District- Gaya, presently resides at Mohalla- Baitarni (East Road), P.O.- Chand Chaura, P.S.- Vishnupad, District- Gaya.

4.

Gyan Prakash Sandwar, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Prasad Sandwar, resident of Ward No. 3, Bajitpur Road, Station Bazar, Barh, P.O. and P.S.- Barh, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prashant Sinha, Advocate For Biscomaun :

Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate Mrs. Aradhana Kumari, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar, AC to Ex-AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for review of the order dated 04.12.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9499 of 2018 whereby the writ petition preferred by the petitioners has been disposed of.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.215 of 2019(4) dt.01-05-2025 2/2

3. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the opposite parties preferred MJC No. 2978 of 2019 which was dismissed and the same was challenged by them in LPA No. 459 of 2023 which too came to be dismissed by the Division Bench on 10.10.2023. He submits that in that background, the petition has become infructuous.

4. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the review petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U