Gopal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45340 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2022 Thana- GADHPURA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Gopal Yadav S/O Raghvendra Yadav @ Raghbendra Yadav Resident Of Village- Manikpur, P.S.- Gadhpura, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gadhpura P.S. Case No. 1 of 2022 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons snatched mobile phone, one biometric machine and Rs. 91,700/- from the informant, while he was returning after collecting the money because he is working in L & T Finance Company.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this present case merely on suspicion.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45340 of 2022(3) dt.13-02-2023 2/2 The petitioner is not named in F.I.R. rather the name of the petitioner came into light in this case on the basis of confessional statement of other co-accused persons, namely, Rakesh Kumar and Jitendra Kumar. He has not been put on T.I.P. and has been remanded in the present case from Gadhpura P.S. Case No. 70 of 2021. It is further submitted that no any stolen article has been recovered either from the conscious possession of the petitioner or from his house. He is languishing in judicial custody since 21.02.2022.

The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Gadhpura P.S. Case No. 1 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Begusarai. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T