← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44918/2025bail granted

Bumma Yadav @ Amresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-30Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44918 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2024 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Bumma Yadav @ Amresh Yadav S/O Mithilesh Yadav, R/o Vill.- Nawabganj, P.S.- Suryagaraha, Dist.- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Sarita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024, dated 28.02.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 379 and 385 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons arrived at the brick kiln of the informant and started firing at the informant. It is further alleged that the petitioner, Shailesh Yadav and others surrounded the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44918 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/3 informant and assaulted him with khanti. It is further alleged that the co-accused persons snatched Rs. 2,000/- from the informant and demanded Rs. 5 lakh as extortion for running the brick kiln.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is no eyewitness to the alleged occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 20.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 80166 of 2024. The petitioner carries three criminal antecedents as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44918 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 3/3 connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T