Dibanath Thakur v. The State Of Bihar Through Secretary Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1256 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2014 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Dibanath Thakur Son of Harsh Nath Thakur, resident of village - Mani Rampur, Near Mahatma Shiv Kumar Inter College, Dharai Mafi, P.S. Munshiganj, District - Amethi (U.P.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary (Home), Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna

4. Deputy Inspector of Police, Trihut Range

5. District Magistrate, Samastipur

6. Senior Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, Bihar

7. Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, Bihar

8. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, Bihar

9. Station House Officer, Mathurapur, Police Station Samastipur

10. Investigating Officer, of Warish Nagar, P.S. Case No. 161 of 2014 Mathurapur ( O.P. ), Police Station Samastipur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Kaushlendra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Amar Nath Deo, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 It seems that the writ application was preferred in the year 2015 for direction to the respondents to investigate the case fairly and in accordance with law. The case being Warish Nagar P.S. Case (Mathurapur O.P.) No. 161 of 2014 was registered on 24/07/2014 for offence under Sections 498(A)/ 326/327/307/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In response to the writ petition the counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 6 and 7 who are the Senior Superintendent of Police Samastipur and

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1256 of 2015(3) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, they have brought on record a copy of the final form which has been submitted in the case showing lack of evidence vide F.F. No. 51 of 2015 dated 27/08/2015 as contained in Annexure A to the counter affidavit. Today when the matter has been called out no one appears to press this application.

Learned counsel for the State is present.

Considering the nature of pleadings available on the record it is apparent that this writ application has become infructuous.

It is disposed of accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/R.S.SenU