← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3106/2015disposed

Raghubansh Mani Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Kumar Binod Narayan Singh The Director Secondary Education Bihar Patn

2018-08-02Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3106 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16092 of 2007 ====================================================== Raghubansh Mani Singh Son of late Bhatu Prasad Singh, resident of House no. 108, Road no.-6, Mohalla:- Indrapuri, P.O.- Keshari Nagar, P.S.- Patliputra, District- Patna-24, retired Assistant, Bihar, School Examination Board, Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Kumar Binod Narayan Singh, the Director Secondary Education Bihar, Patna .

2. The Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna, through its Secretary, Sri Harihar Nath Jha.

3. Sri Lalkeshwar Prasad, Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna.

4. Sri Harihar Nath Jha, Secretary Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna.

5. Sri Sheonath Prasad, the then Joint Secretary-cum-Enquiry Officer, Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Chittranjan Sinha : Ratna Kumari For BSEB : Mr. Lalit Kishore : Mrs. Binita Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 02-08-2018 I have gone through the order of this Court dated 25.11.2013 passed in CWJC no. 16098 of 2007 and I find that the grievance of the petitioner herein regarding non-payment of the amount of honorarium of annual and supplementary examination of the year 2003 is not covered by the order of the writ court dated 25.11.2013 and admittedly, rest of the dues amount have been paid to the petitioner herein.

Patna High Court MJC No.3106 of 2015 (4) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 In view of the aforesaid, there is no need to proceed further in the present case and if so advised, the petitioner may avail any other remedy available to him under the law for redressal of his aforesaid grievances.

The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U