Tinku v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20707 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2018 Thana -GOH District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Tinku Son of Umesh Sharma @ Umesh Kumar Sharma resident of village - Motha, P.S. - Bandeya, District - Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Roy, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and leaned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Goh P.S.Case No. 27 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
The accusation against the petitioner is of assault by the butt of the pistol on the head and other two persons assaulted with rod to the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is a case and counter case between the parties and allegation of assault is by butt.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20707 of 2018 (3) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 prayer of bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Goh P.S.Case No. 27 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial MagistrateAurangabad, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other conditions that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before police as and when required, otherwise, prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T