Ranti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10811 of 2016 =========================================================== Ranti Kumari, daughter of Sri Laxmi Yadav, resident of Village -Jhakhra, P.S. - Gopalpur, District - West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar.

3. The District Education Officer, West Champaran.

4. The District Program Officer, West Champaran.

5. The Block Development Officer, Sikata, District - West Champaran at Bettiah.

6. The Block Education Officer, Sikra, West Champaran at Bettiah.

7. The Gram Panchayat Raj, Gochari, District - West Champaran at Motihari.

8. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Gochari, District - West Champaran at Motihari.

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Gochari, District - West Champaran at Motihari.

10. Rima Kumari wife of Alok Kumar Yadav resident of village - Patkuhiya, P.S. - Balthar, District - West Champaran at Bettiah.

11. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, West Champaran through its Secretary Ceramic.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Indeshwari Prasad , AC to GA7 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-04-2018 In view of the fact that now the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority.

In case, such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is required to decide the appeal in accordance with law on its own merit after condoning the delay, if

Patna High Court CWJC No.10811 of 2016 dt.23-04-2018 2/2 any, in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the writ application was filed against the decision of the District Teachers Appellate Authority on account of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is not functional and the writ application remained pending before this Court for nearly two years.

With the aforesaid, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date25.04.2018 Transmission Date