Chhanguri Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42022 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2019 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== CHHANGURI YADAV, S/o Brahamdev Yadav, R/o village- Bhatgama, P.S.- Chousa, Distt.- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 15-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Chousa P.S. Case No.94 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 25(1-B)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged that one loaded country made pistol and two cartridges have been recovered from possession of the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that Petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2019.

It is mentioned in the written report that petitioner was apprehended while trying to run away.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the seizure list it is mentioned that petitioner was apprehended from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42022 of 2019(2) dt.15-07-2019 2/2 house, but in the description of the firearm, it is mentioned that recovery has been made from the waist of the petitioner. Keeping in view period of custody, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM, Udakishunganj, Mahdepura, in connection with Chousa P.S. Case No.94 of 2019, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

Further, (i) the petitioner will remain present on each and every date of trial, (ii) His absence on two consecutive date(s) without any reasonable cause will make his bail bond liable to be cancelled, and (iii) the petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses in any way and will not hamper the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T