Sujeet Kumar Jha @ Sujeet Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48356 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2022 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar Jha @ Sujeet Jha Son Of Suresh Jha Resident Of VillageGangeya, Ps -KATRA, Distt- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nitya Nand Neeraj For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 138 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Jehanabad.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused illegally withdraw Rs. 30,43,612/- from twenty S.H.G. Accounts. They withdraw money by obtaining false thumb impression.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48356 of 2023(4) dt.12-10-2023 2/2 the then Branch Manager. He submits that no any forensic inspection have been made of signature, thumb impression, and aadhar card and only on the basis of suspicion petitioner is made accused in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail submitted that the petitioner is also involved in the present case.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T