← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2710/2013disposed

Vinod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-02Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2710 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5637 of 2007 ====================================================== Vinod Kumar S/O Late Prasadi Sao Resident Of Village Mananpur, P.S. Kawakole, District Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2.Mr. Ashutosh Kumar,the Director Primary Education, Education Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Ashwani Thakur, the District Magistrate, Nawada.

4. Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, the District Education Officer, Nawada.

5. Mr. Anil Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Kauakole, District Nawada.

6.Mr. Bhubneshwar Yadav, the Block Education Extension Officer, District Nawada.

7. Sanjeev Kumar S/O Sri Kameshwar Sao Resident Of Village Mananpur, P.S. Kawakole, District Nawada.

8. Ram Balak Prasad Yadav S/O Sri Sahdeo Prasad Yadav Resident Of Village Mahulia Tand, P.S. Kawakole, District Nawada. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2015 Learned A.C. to G.A. 18 appearing on behalf of the State submits that in compliance of the order dated 12.09.2008 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 5637 of 2007, the opposite party no.5- the Block Development Officer, Kauakole, District- Nawada, has decided the representation of the petitioner on 03.09.2013, which is also communicated to the petitioner, vide memo no.1460 dated 07.09.2013 which would appear from Annexure A to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.5 on 01.10.2013.

Patna High Court MJC No.2710 of 2013 (2) dt.02-03-2015 2/2 Since the order, under contempt, has been complied with by the opposite party, no further action is required to be taken against the opposite party.

Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of. However, if the petitioner feels any grievance, he may take recourse in accordance with law in the appropriate forum. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) singh/- U