Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44105/2025bail granted

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-28Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44105 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2025 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Son of Lalu Ram Resident of Village- Pohra (Paroha), P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sweety Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 217 of 2025 dated 20.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, on search, one mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and one mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the coaccused, Deepak Kumar. It is further alleged that one motorcycle was also recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44105 of 2025(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 this case. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in this case on mere suspicion. The petitioner is not the owner of the said motorcycle. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Vaishali in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 217 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T