Patna High CourtL.P.A/870/2016disposed

Satya Narayan Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-14The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.870 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22170 of 2012 ===========================================================

1. Satya Narayan Singh Son of Late Bihari Singh null

2. Ramadhar Singh Son of Late Ramchandra Singh,

3. Kashi Nath Bhagat Son of Late Radha Singh

4. Surendra Singh Son of late Dudh Nath Bhagat

5. Keoli Kuer wife of Late Shiv Bhajan Bhagat All are residents of VillageSaheb Tola, P..- Behea District- Bhojpur. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through The Secretary Government of Bihar New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Collector Bhojpur.

3. The Land Reforms Commissioner, Bihar Patna.

4. The Administrator Bihar Agricultural Marketing Board Pant Bhawan Patna

5. The Special Officer Bihar Agricultural Marketing Board Pant Bhawan, Patna.

6. The Circle Officer, Jagdishpur, Bhojpur.

7. The Circle Inspector, Jagdishpur, Bhojpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Mukul Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. AAG10- P.N.SHAHI =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 14-07-2017 Keeping in view the fact that the issue with regard to the acquisition of the petitioners' land was already decided in C.W.J.C. No. 4294 of 2003 on 22.07.2003, learned Writ Court has not committed any error in rejecting the writ petition on account of earlier order passed which acted as res judicata and reopening the issue after twenty years, we find no error in the order passed by the Writ Court

Patna High Court LPA No.870 of 2016 dt.14-07-2017 2/2 warring reconsideration. In case, the petitioners have any grievance, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to take recourse to any other remedy as may be permissible under law. With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20/07/2017 Transmission Date NA