Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40049/2020dismissed

Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-09-27Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40049 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2020 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR SON OF RAMJEE CHAUDHARY Resident Of Lachhwar , P. S. and P. O. -Thawe , District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indrajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Thawe P.S. Case No. 11 of 2020 registered under Sections 366A, 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, one Divya Kumari came to the informant's house and took his grand daughter, Renu Kumari for sewing. The informant's grand daughter did not return. It was known to the informant that the petitioner took Renu Kumari on his motorcycle.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40049 of 2020(3) dt.27-09-2021 2/2 of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. A vague allegation has been made. There is no allegation of physical assault or sexual abuse alleged against the petitioner. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. The victim in her statement recorded under Section-164 Cr.P.C. has made allegation of abduction against the petitioner.

Considering the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. If the petitioner surrenders before the court below and seeks regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T