Vipin Kumar @ Teni Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51558 of 2015 (3) dt.29-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51558 of 2015 ====================================================== Vipin Kumar @ Teni Singh s/o Siya Singh r/o - Rajwara, P.S. - Atri, Distt. - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 31 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. It is submitted that on the basis of information furnished by spy, the petitioner and co-accused have been arrested and thereafter the police got recorded the confessional statement which has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law, nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner, he has not been put on TIP and suffering in custody since 11.02.2015, chargesheet has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51558 of 2015 (3) dt.29-02-2016 already been submitted under Section 396 IPC and in this case similarly situated co-accused Mukesh Kumar Mahto @ Mukesh Kumar has already been allowed bail vide Cri. Misc. No. 27890 of 2015 and as such, the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Nawada in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No.

31 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.