Bhuteli Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47493 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2024 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Bhuteli Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav S/O Bhola Yadav R/Vill- Tipura, P.SBihiya, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimal Kumar, Adv.
For the informant : Ms. Priya Kumari, Adv. Mr. Diwakar, Adv.
Mr. Shivam Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Sudhakar Ranjan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024 dated 26.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 324, 326, 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant was returning to home then the petitioner and the co-accused person riding on a motorcycle came and an altercation took place between them. In course of altercation, the petitioner assaulted the informant with knife on his right pungera and waist and then they fled away. Thereafter, the informant was taken to the hospital for treatment.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47493 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/2 case. The petitioner has been implicated in this case on the instance of some persons inimical to the petitioner. As per the injury report of the injured, the informant sustained stab injury in the right thigh of the body. The nature of injuries are not mentioned in the impugned order dated 06.06.2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 27.03.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T