Gyanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22120 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -258 Year- 2014 Thana -MASRAKH District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Gyanti Devi, Wife of Mantosh Rai, Resident of Village-Sikti, Police Station Masrakh, Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umeshnand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Masrakh P.s.Case No.258 of 2014 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 364/34, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner happens to be sister-in-law of the deceased and it is alleged that the petitioner alongwith the others has killed the deceased.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and no specific allegation has been attributed against her and she is a lady.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22120 of 2018 (3) dt.21-06-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on surrender she will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Saran in connection with Masrakh P.S.Case No.258 of 2014 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of her bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T