Imran @ Imranul Haque v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47299 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-439 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.
Imran @ Imranul Haque S/O Late Sayeedul Haque @ Bhola R/O VillageEkmighat, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Bahadurpur, Dist.- Darbhanga 2.
Nusrat @ Nusrat Parween @ Babi W/O Ishteyaque Ahmad R/O MohallaSantu Nagar, Pani Tanki, Ward no. 2, P.s.- Madhubani, Dist.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sarvadeo Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Om Prakash Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is a case of dowry death. The prosecution case, in brief, is that daughter of informant was married to co-accused Shahnawaj Noori and thereafter, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners started demanding dowry and subsequently, daughter of the informant was killed due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47299 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioner no. 1 is cousin father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is cousin sister-in-law of the deceased and they are simply victims of over-implications. Allegation against petitioners is general and omnibus. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and they are not concerned with family affairs of the deceased. Moreover, thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased who is already in custody.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the fact that husband of the deceased is already in custody, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Benipur, Darbhanga in connection with Bahera P. S. Case No. 439 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47299 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 Sanhita, 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T